Compressed air consumption in comparison

With many vane motor agitators, technical specifications often only mention performance data such as kilowatts and speed. The actual air consumption is often not mentioned - or is only stated at low speeds, which are rarely sufficient in practical mixing applications.

As vane motors hardly generate any torque, high speeds are usually required in the application in order to achieve a satisfactory stirring result. In practice, this leads to significantly higher air consumption than expected.

Our efficiency test shows transparently in three scenarios (stirring in a 30 l hobbock, 200 l drum and 1,000 IBC) how air consumption and performance behave under real conditions - for well-founded decisions and maximum energy efficiency.

APPLICATION: Stirring a medium with a viscosity of 3000 mPas*

PTM pneumatic motors

Vane motor

IN 30l HOBBOCK

10

Air consumption
l/min

30

Energy costs
€/year

250

Air consumption
l/min

787

Energy costs
€/year

IN A 200L DRUM

100

Air consumption
l/min

315

Energy costs
€/year

1100

Air consumption
l/min

3468

Energy costs
€/year

1000L IBC

200

Air consumption
l/min

624

Energy costs
€/year

2550

Air consumption
l/min

8042

Energy costs
€/year

*Basic data:
Compressor: Power: 10 kW, delivery rate: 2.5 Nm3/min, compressed air coefficient: 80 Wh/Nm3
Compressed air costs: 2.1 ct/Nm3
Electricity costs: 22 ct/kWh

APPLICATION: Stirring a medium with a viscosity of 3000 mPas*

IN 30l HOBBOCK

PTM pneumatic motors

10

Air consumption
l/min

30

Energy costs
€/year

Vane motor

250

Air consumption
l/min

787

Energy costs
€/year

IN A 200L DRUM

PTM pneumatic motors

100

Air consumption
l/min

315

Energy costs
€/year

Vane motor

1100

Air consumption
l/min

3468

Energy costs
€/year

1000L IBC

PTM pneumatic motors

200

Air consumption
l/min

624

Energy costs
€/year

Vane motor

2550

Air consumption
l/min

8042

Energy costs
€/year

*Basic data:
Compressor: Power: 10 kW, delivery rate: 2.5 Nm3/min, compressed air coefficient: 80 Wh/Nm3
Compressed air costs: 2.1 ct/Nm3
Electricity costs: 22 ct/kWh

Stories from the field

„Vane motors initially appear to be cheaper to buy. Unfortunately, this still steers some companies in the wrong direction. With a simple amortization calculation, we have proven to all our customers that the PTM radial piston motor is cheaper after just one year of operation due to the savings in energy costs alone.“

Vratislav Srám
CEO LPW kovo s.r.o.

„The PTM radial piston motor is the best the pneumatic drive market has to offer. A high-quality, energy-efficient and cost-saving product. Definitely without alternative“

Jozsef Cseh
CEO Conpart

Welcome to our Shop

Discover our efficient motors and drives in our online store: